LESBIANISM FILM NAMED "FIRE"
By S.P. Attri (USA)
Jan 17th, 1999
1. Lesbianism has its origin
and source in Islam. Though lesbianism occurs outside of Islam
also, the major practitioners of this art reside only inside the
bandwidth of Islam. Of course, most Hindus have slipped up on that
and do not have a clue about this Islamic connection because the
truth about it is being drowned out by the redwood horns of the
false-hood manufacturers of the 3-M company (Moslems,
Missionaries, and Marxists). The 3-M company is assisted in this
nefarious effort by their Phony-Liberal Hindu cronies who have
targetted BJP and the Hindus, whom they categorize, with gusto and
gaiety, as the loathsome Hindu Communalists. The recent election
setback of the BJP in three states has also augmented the appetite
of these home-grown traitors to launch their furious anti-Hindu
barrages. One might reasonably ask what is the rationale behind
the pyrotechnics of these sworn traitors, especially their fury
and froth on a movie that goes by the name of "FIRE."
2. The creator and Producer-Director of this controversial movie
is an Indian Hippie named Deepa Mehta, who is presently living in
Canada, a place where homo-sexuality and lesbianism are
frequently-discussed subjects. Deepa has been absent from India
for quite a while now and her knowledge of the current social
customs of India is at best questionable. True to her Hippie
Credentials, however, she is out to expose and destroy the
male-dominated patriarchal system of India, wherein the woman is
oppressed and her sexual urges are suppressed. To challenge this
oppressive patriarchal order, Deepa has chosen a lesbian theme,
suitably mixed with profanity, to take on the existing social
customs order of India. What she is actually accomplishing by
doing that, however, is the disintegration of the traditional
family system and her usage of the extreme measures is offending
the sensibilities of the Hindu. She figures she has to do it to
increase the controversy of the film to attract attention and to
achieve the widest possibility publicity.
3. Through her directorial tricks, Deepa Mehta has amalgmated the
lonliness of Indian (Hindu) women with lesbianism. But where did
Deepa get the idea that women in India turn to lesbianism because
of circumstances of lonliness?
It is true, of course, that women sometimes are lonely in India
and at other places too. But after marriage, Indian women often
stay in the house of their in-laws while their husbands are out on
a job in a differrent city or even in a different country for long
periods of time. This is a well-established custom, fully
accepted, and widely practised in Indian society. There is never a
case of lesbianism arising out of these domestic situations.
Therefore, Deepa Mehta's deductions are flawed for Indian customs
and situations.
4. Then what could be Deepa's motivations? The real motive of
Deepa Mehta is hunger for publicity, publicity at any cost, and
her pretense as a champion of oppressed women is a phony facade.
Most women in India don't even know what lesbianism is. However,
this kind of sheen and stuff of lesbianism does appeal to the
Phony-Liberal Hindus who are tie-ing together with the 3-M company
to desecrate and destroy Hinduism with names of Hindu goddesses
Sita and Radha, as the names of two characters in the movie
"FIRE," in a lesbian relationship.
A question may be asked why were Moslem women names like Khadija
(Prophet Mohammad's wife) and Fatima (Prophet's daughter) not used
in this movie. Moslem women are much more oppressed in India than
the Hindu women are and have much greater need of liberation. Why
were the Moslem women ignored and left out? The answer is simply a
matter of practical reality. If Deepa had used any Moslem names,
the Moslems would assassinate Deepa and burn down the cinema halls
where this devilish movie is shown. Deepa knows this unconditional
outcome very very well. Moslems have demonstrated this kind of
capability and outburst reaction in the past and the lessons have
not been lost on Deepa. Deepa also knows that Hindus would not
assassinate her nor do the other kinds of nasty things to her that
the Moslems would surely do to her. It is simply a matter of
ground reality. This mixed up broad is not dumb, she is collecting
food in her net and she certainly knows where her meal- ticket is.
Anti-Hindu "character names" are a much safer bet for
this kind of questionable and controversial film than are the
anti-Islamic names. She has, therefore, cast her lot with the
anti-Hindu crowd, hungry as she is for publicity and notoriety,
and is putting up a stunt to get some free publicity through a
pyrotechnic baptism of the film.
5. Deepa's knowledge of current Indian social customs may be
marginal but her ring of powerful friends is anything but
marginal, and with band-wagoners like Dilip Kumar (real name :
Mohammad Sarwar Yusuf Khan), Shabana Azmi and her husband Javed
Akhtar backing her up, she has ample support. It is very likely
the help of such powerful friends and connections, that got the
film through the Censor Board, even though the film has explicit
lesbianism theme and has pornographic scenes too. Influence-peddaling
and conspiracy, has to be suspected, therefore.
6. The primary band-wagoner and supporter of this damnable movie
is Signor Dilip Kumar (real name: Mohammad Sarwar Yusuf Khan), a
Moslem of Jehadi status and character, who has hoodwinked the
imprudent Hindu Sucker into unsuspiciously trusting his phony
dare-devil claim that he is 100% secular. This dude (Yusuf Khan)
is a lie-ing scoundrel and his portended secularism is a
fraudulent sham. The motivations that spur this Phony Punk are
Pan-Islamism and Islamic Jehad. It is no secret that Dilip Kumar
proceeds on lecture tours to bring in money for the far-off
Bosnian Moslems who are fighting the Kafir Yugoslav Serfs. Dilip
Kumar has not raised even one cent for the tens of thousands of
Hindus who have been murdered and viciously brutalized by his
fellow Moslems in Kashmir and when questioned about this divergent
difference, Signor Dilip Kumar takes up a safe posture of silence
and he stays "Mum." Raising money aside, Dilip Kumar has
not even questioned or censured the the ruthless savagery of his
fellow Moslems against the Kafir Hindus of Kashmir. Why?
Because Jehad goes right to his heart and he thorougly approves
the bloody slaughter of the Kafir Hindus in Kashmir, who according
to his Koran, are sub- human, and he wants the Moslem Jehadi
parties to take over Kashmir and kick the Indian Army out of
there. To Dilip Kumar, the Moslem terrorists of Kashmir, are
servants of Allah, who are only doing their Jehad thing, and are
following a policy of "general toleration" as defined by
Islam and, therefore, by staying "wordless" he is being
"tolerant" and "100% secular" himself.
7. After all, what the Moslems of Kashmir are doing, is
eliminating the accursed Kafirs (Infidels) which is perfectly
worthy and acceptable by the laws of Koran, the cuddle-fish of
Islam. The Kashmiri Moslems are only ending the wicked ways of the
Hindu Kafirs, the ways that have been thoroughly condemned in
Koran, Hadis, and the Shariat of Islam. It is because of such
supreme and subtle services to Islam, that Pakistan awarded the
medal of Nishan-E-Pakistan to Signor Dilip Kumar and Dilip Kumar
travelled to Pakistan to pick up his prestigious award, given to
him by Pakistan, to keep up his elusive hate-Hindu hobby-horse
trotting at full speed. Inspite of these Islamic transactions and
stitches, Dilip Kumar continues to insist hypocritically that he
is Hindustani and 100% Secular. What a mealy-mouthed Machiavelian
lie?
The wicked antics of Dilip Kumar and of other Moslems like Shabana
Azmi and others who claim to be 100% secular, should not stupefy
any Hindu because Moslems can talk from both sides of the mouth
especially with a Kafir and Koran gives them specific unlimited
permission to do so, while dealing with a Kafir. Therefore,
Moslems like Dilip Kumar and Shabana Azmi, covertly and closed-mouthedly
hunger to insult, desecrate, and degrade the Hindu and his
Hinduism and they raise their cudgels for this purpose by using
the phony guise of artistic freedom, individual rights, individual
freedom and crap like that, while intrinsically intending fully
well to blast Hinduism right out of existence.
8. It is no secret that Signor Dilip Kumar has not been doing much
of anything for quite some time. Therefore, when the story of the
film "FIRE" was brought to his attention, he leaped at
the chance, it brought out the Moslem inside of him. This is
because the film has juicy names of Hindu goddesses for the names
of characters, in a lesbian relationship, in the film. What better
place could there be for Dilip Kumar to try out his Islamic
deception to shove the Kafir Hindu and his Hinduism into the
ground, while at the same time becoming a grand patriarch of Islam
himself in the process and earning a ticket to the Moslem's
Bihisht?
Besides, in the present time, abusing and exploiting the Hindu
gods and goddesses is fashionable, wide spread and approved by the
Phony-Liberal Hindu crowd, casting his lot with this crowd,
therefore, is a safe bet for Dilip Kumar. He knows very well that
it is the same Phony-Liberal crowd that was pitching for M.F.
Hussein, when he was drawing the nude pictures of our Hindu
goddesses. The Phony-Liberals did not even notice the obvious
double-standard that Hussein was employing; Hussein did not dare
draw the nude picture (or any picture) of Khadija, Fatima, Ayesha,
Mohammad or any other Moslem person and Phonies did not even
notice that the pretended secularism of Hussein is a malicious
misrepresentation.
9. The straight-forward truth is that the 3-M company and their
Phony-Liberal Hindu cronies do not give a damn about Hindu
culture, they want to exterminate it and they do it in the guise
and guile of individual freedom, artistic freedom, and other
riff-raff. It is true, of course, that if Dilip Kumar & Co
want to produce a film, they can certainly do it but if they
depict lesbian relationship between our goddesses, such as Sita
and Radha, as has been done in the film "FIRE," we
Hindus cannot tolerate it. This kind of exhibition of Hinduism
desecration and profanity is not art, but a clear attempt to
demote and degrade Hinduism and Hindus of today are not going to
take it lying down, they will be counter- punching.
Shri Bal Thackeray of Shiv Sena has made an exceptionally
excellent proposal to Dilip Kumar. Thackeray says that he will not
oppose this film if names like Shabana and Saira (name of Dilip
Kumar's wife) are used in place of Sita and Radha, for the names
of the characters in the film. This is a tremendous proposal and a
chance for Dilip Kumar to demonstrate the sincerity of his
secularism that he has been touting all this time. We are
interested in finding out how Dilip and Shabana would react to
names of Shabana and Saira as the names of lesbian partners in the
film "FIRE."
10. This is a litmus test for Dilip's secularism. But Dilip and
Shabana are not taking up Thackeray's proposal. Instead, they are
busy bristling with indignation and are crying about individual
rights, artistic freedom etc etc.
But what about the individual rights of Salman Rushdie and Shah
Bano? What about the individual rights of Triple-Talaqued women
with children, who have been reduced to poverty, to die on the
foot-paths? What about the thousands and thousands of Moslem women
who are victims of barbaric laws of Islam?
Both Dilip Kumar and Shabana Azmi cry themselves hoarse talking
about artistic freedom and individual rights, but they both stay
"Mute And Mum" when the violators are Moslems and their
Islam; they display their Standard Islamic Double-Standard.
11. In the meantime, watching the outrageous actions of the
producers of this film, the Shiv Sainiks, clad only in
undergarments, are now presenting themselves at every place where
Nangon-Ka-Neta (name given to Dilip Kumar by Shiv Sainiks) goes.
They will do the same thing at every place where Shabana Azmi and
her husband Javed Akhtar go for their social functions. Let us see
how Dilip Kumar and Shabana Azmi react to these demonstrations.
All these demonstrations are peaceful, there is no violence
whatsoever and, therefore, no body can object.
Asks Shri Bal Thackeray: If Dilip Kumar and Shabana cannot
tolerate Shiv Sainiks stripped down to their underwears, how can
they put up with the scenes of nudity in the film? A logical
question, indeed!
Dilip Kumar and Shabana have requested police protection. What for
?Who are they kidding? Shiv Sainiks are not trying to hurt either
Dilip Kumar or Shabana Azmi. They are only trying to humor them
and they have thrown a splendid challenge to both Dilip and
Shabana regarding the change of names of characters in the film.
But it seems that these two Pakis, Dilip and Shabana, have no
intention of taking up the superb proposal of the Shiv Sainks.
Instead they will do what they really like to do i.e. Bad-Mouth
Hinduism plenteously , insult and degrade it as much as they can,
and hoist and heave the slogans of artistic freedom etc in the
guise of free-thinking 100% secular Indians. We Hindus need to
give some befitting humor to these Dumb Pakis. Will they come out
clean before the Shiv Sainiks and take the humor or go back and
wear the BURQUA?
Arise Hindus!
http://www.hinduunity.org
If you wish to discuss any articles in depth
with other Hindutva Soldiers, please go to:
Soldiers of
Hindutva Forums at Hinduunity.org
|
